Yesterday’s posting demonstrated that some employers are treating employees differently when it comes to health insurance benefits, which may or may not be provided because of the employee’s relationship status.
So the big question is, what’s fair? Should employers treat all employees equally when it comes to health insurance benefits?
Most people automatically answer “of course.” But what about employees who have no children or spouse/partner? Is it fair that employers provide health insurance benefits for children, spouses, or partners of employees, while failing to make the same financial contribution to employees who don’t have kids or spouses/partners?
What’s fair??
Related Posts:
- Maryland Legislature Moves Closer to Legalizing Gay Marriage
- Catholic Charities Case Regarding Illinois Civil Unions Remains Undecided
- Demand for NY Gay Marriage Licenses Overwhelming
- Illinois Won’t Renew Catholic Charities Contract Because of Illinois Civil Unions Law
Comments on this entry are closed.